ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the key words related with the growth of psychological rehabilitation literature of psychological rehabilitation in China. Methods The journal articles associated with psychological rehabilitation in CNKI were analyzed with key word frequency.The relationship between the cumulative frequency of key words and the growth of literature were analyzed with Linear Regression Analysis. Result Based on the cumulative frequency of 340 key words frequencies more than 4 in each year, Linear Regression Analysis extracted 10 words that correlated with the literature growth, which were Psychological Nursing, Psychological Problem, Psychological Response,Psychotics, Emotional Disorder, Type A Behavior, Social Psychology, SCL-90, Prosthesis, and Psychiatry. Conclusion The major objects of the researches of psychological rehabilitation in China were psychological problem, psychological response, psychotics, emotional disorder, type A behavior; the major tools were social psychology, SCL-90; the researchers mainly come from the nurse, and the professionals of prosthesis and psychiatry.
ABSTRACT
@#目的通过循证和专家讨论研究法建立第一版针对脑卒中的一套综合ICF核心分类模板和与之相应的简明ICF核心分类模板。方法来自于不同国家和地区的国际专家从初步研究中搜集证据,结合这些证据进行正式的决策并最终达成共识。初步研究包括Delphi研究方法、对ICF分类的系统评价以及实证数据的收集。结果来自12个不同国家的39位专家出席会议并达成共识。专家初步研究决定在ICF分类的第二、第三和第四级水平上针对脑卒中确定一套448个类目的ICF核心分类摸板,其中193项类目属于身体功能,26项属于身体结构,165项属于活动和参与,64项属于环境因素。综合性ICF核心分类模板包括在ICF分类第二级水平上的130个类目,其中41项属于"身体功能",5项属于"身体结构",51项属于"活动和参与",33项属于"环境因素"。简明型ICF核心分类模板包括在ICF分类第二级水平上的18个类目,其中6项属于身体功能,2项属于身体结构,7项属于活动参与,以及3项属于环境因素。结论专家组通过整合研究过程中的证据,以及专家们基于ICF框架和分类的观点达成正式的共识,并确定针对"脑卒中"的ICF核心分类模板,同时界定综合型ICF核心分类模板和简要型ICF核心分类模板。
ABSTRACT
@#ObjectiveTo reveal status in quo of rehabilitation research according to rehabilitation periodical literature.MethodsMEDLINE and CBM are the retrieval databases during 1995—2002. ICD-10 is the main classification tool of central nervous diseases.ResultsThe percentage of rehabilitation literature is 1.32% on MEDLINE, 1.53% on CBM during 1995—2002. The ratio of rehabilitation literature is 1.67 between MEDLINE and CBM. The common study fields include stroke, paraplegia, hypertension, cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, Parkinson disease, epilepsy, and cerebral infarction, etc.The foreign study takes advantage in multiple sclerosis, and tetraplegia, etc. The fewer fields are neuromyelitis optica, arachnoiditis, and Huntington's disease, etc.ConclusionsThe study of central nervous disease rehabilitation is generally similar on some common CNS diseases, some foreign studies taking advantage.